Euthanasia is a Christian Ethical Dilemma
It’s normal to make a difficult choice between two possibilities in life. People’s decisions directly impact their future spiritual development and the foundations for their advancement. Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma and is a very confusing topic. While it would be incorrect to say that individuals are wicked because they make terrible judgments, the boundary between making a mistake and leading a sinful life is razor-thin. Herein lies the value of spiritual counseling; when confronted with a tough situation, a Christian leader may point out the road that will lead to salvation.
The euthanasia debate has heated up in recent years, and this particular instance is a stark illustration of the subject. The dilemma of a young woman who has been a paraplegic since a sad event is presupposed in this instance. She has considered Euthanasia as a viable solution to her current challenges, which range from the physical to the perception that she is a burden on her family due to a quick and dramatic decline in her life quality. It presents a problem: she could take her own life if she wanted to stop feeling sad, but taking such a drastic measure is prohibited by Christian teaching. It proves Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma.
There are several beliefs that Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma. Aside from the fact that assisted suicide is forbidden in the Bible, it must be acknowledged that in specific cases, Scripture does provide a degree of leeway when legitimate circumstances warrant it. These thoughts may have occurred to the Christian saints during times of extreme pain. A very vivid illustration of the phenomenon is Job’s experience of being tormented: “So that my soul chooseth strangulation and death rather than my life.” My days are a mirage, and I hate it; I would rather die than spend them with you. Please leave me alone (Job 7:15-16). As a result, contemplating suicide is not viewed as a sign of weakness or something to be ashamed of. Under contemplation is a strategy that allows for more reflection and rethinking of one’s ideals.
However, the Bible’s precepts plainly state that assisted suicide cannot be condoned or allowed by the Christian faith proving Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma. Any intervention to help the patient will have to focus on providing her with a new purpose in life rather than simply making her miserable and apprehensive about any new experiences that life has to offer. To assist an individual in progress in her appraisal of the issue and her evaluation of her alternatives, the following basic belief should be taken into account:
Resolution of ‘Euthanasia is a Christian Ethical Dilemma.’
Consider telling the involved person that her life is a gift from God and that she doesn’t have a right to reject it since doing so would mean she rejects God. As a result, she should instead focus on appreciating what she has and making the most of her current predicament. Her spirituality should be worked on to reconcile with Christianity and reclaim her connection to God.
Evaluation of ‘Euthanasia is a Christian Ethical Dilemma’
If we have an honest and open discussion, the lady may change her mind about her decision and, by extension, her perspective on the present circumstance. Even though she has certainly endured a lot of pain and may be reluctant to embrace God as her savior, one must recognize that persuading will be difficult. As a result, implementing an intervention is highly recommended. To be more precise, the lady’s family members must support her. Because of this, she should be able to effectively convey the importance of her family’s support.
Comparison of ‘Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma.’
For those unable to adapt to the changing environment, the choice is typically considered a way to get around this problem. Even while assisted suicide may seem like a simple method to end one’s pain, it doesn’t address the root of the problem. To be more specific, the topic of salvation should be raised. The proponents of Euthanasia believe that a person has the right to decide whether or not they wish to live or die. By this, I mean that euthanasia proponents are building their whole moral argument on the idea that life is nothing more than an experience that has no connection to the transcendent.
Those who believe that they have suffered enough to be able to make a mistake in their priorities and act in an egotistical, non-Christian manner may consider the assumption mentioned above to be valid. As an extenuating case, however, the selfish decision to reject God and the Christian faith remains a bad step regarding one’s spiritual progress and the possibilities for salvation. It proves Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma.
Religious Perspectives On Euthanasia
General Christian View
The vast majority of Christians are opposed to Euthanasia. Human beings were created in God’s image, and therefore, they are entitled to live. As a gift from God, life is priceless. Life is a gift from God. Life’s natural processes, such as birth and death, should be respected. No human being has the authority to kill an innocent person, even if the victim wishes to die.
Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma since they believe they were created in God’s likeness and humans are valued. Being made in the image of God, human life has intrinsic worth and dignity because we share in God’s eternal existence. When we say that God made us in His image, we don’t mean that we look exactly like him. Rather, we have a special potential for rational life, which allows us to recognize and want what is good. Those who cultivate these talents are living a life as near to God’s life of love as is possible. It is a wonderful thing as long as people can continue doing this.
To advocate for Euthanasia is to believe that an individual’s existing life is not worth living. A person’s value and dignity cannot be recognized if he or she is deemed worthy of death in this manner. As a result, any argument based on a person’s happiness is utterly pointless. No one has the right to devalue anybody, not themselves; thus, they should not call for Euthanasia.
Position of Catholic Church on ‘Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma.’
A fetus or an embryo cannot be killed, whether a baby or an elderly person dying of an incurable sickness. There is no justification whatsoever for the death of an innocent human being. Nobody can ask for this act of killing, either for themselves or for someone else in their care, and no one can overtly or implicitly consent to it, and no authority can properly suggest or approve it. The breach of the divine law, an offense against human dignity, a crime against life, and an attack on humanity are all violations of the divine law.
Some people may feel they have a right to ask for their death or that of a loved one because of unbearable suffering or other causes. Even though the individual’s guilt may be decreased or eliminated in certain circumstances, the character of this act of killing, which will always be something to be rejected, remains unchanged. The cries of the terminally sick for death should not be seen as a request for Euthanasia but rather as a desperate cry for assistance and affection. The statement has proven Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma. It’s not just medical attention that a sick person requires; he or she also needs to be surrounded by loved ones, including parents and children, physicians, and nurses.
Position of Protestant Denominations
Many Protestant faiths have released declarations on Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. There is a tendency for conservative religious organizations to be the most outspoken opponents. They are more tolerant of people making their own decisions than conservative denominations. It proves Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma.
There’s a “compelling compassionate argument” for physician-assisted dying, but the Anglican Church opposes it, says Archbishop of Canterbury Owan Williams. An increasing number of Episcopalians think taking a human life using drugs to ease an incurable illness’s pain is ethically immoral. Others are in favor of physician-assisted suicide in very limited circumstances.
As a church, we declare that willfully eliminating life created in the image of God is opposed to our Christian conscience. While this assertion is evident, we also realize that responsible health care practitioners struggle to pick the lesser evil in unclear borderline situations – for example, when suffering becomes so unbearable that life is indistinguishable from torture.
Methodists believe Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma. Methodists typically consider the person’s freedom of conscience in determining the manner and timing of death as a source of moral authority for the individual. Certain regional conferences have supported the legalization of physician-assisted death. Euthanasia or “mercy killing” is murder if performed by a doctor, anybody else, or even the patient.
Presbyterian Church in America
United Church of Christ
The Church affirms individual liberty and responsibility. The right to choose is a genuine Christian option, even though it has not been argued that hastened death is the Christian perspective. The United Church of Christ and the Methodist Church on the West Coast have made pro-choice pronouncements. The Methodist, Presbyterian, and Episcopal denominations allow individual decision-making in circumstances of active Euthanasia, putting them among the most liberal.
Mainline and Liberal Christian denominations
Position of Judaism
Because “only God who gives life may take it away,” Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and all other forms of suicide are nearly universally forbidden in Jewish belief. Euthanasia is considered as removing something that belongs to God. According to Judaism, “God created man and woman in his likeness.” Even though life is regarded as a gift from God, human life is precious. The sanctity of human life dictates that human life must be considered as an end in itself in all situations other than self-defense or martyrdom. Consequently, therapy cannot be stopped or abbreviated due to concerns about the patient’s convenience or usefulness or even out of a sense of empathy for their suffering. For the sake of the patient or anybody else, Euthanasia cannot be practiced.
Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma since it is forbidden under Jewish law to kill a person whose death has been predicted by medical experts as an act of murder. As a result, there can be no positive euthanasia. A human being’s sacredness overshadows even his or her freedom.
Position of Islam
Muslims also confirm that Euthanasia is a Christian ethical dilemma. Every human life has intrinsic worth that should be treated with reverence and respect. In Islam, there is no such thing as a life that is not worth living. Islam forbids the justification of taking one’s own life to avoid pain and suffering. When a guy suffered a wound and became irritated with the agony, he took a knife and cut his hand with it, and the blood didn’t stop until he died,” said the Prophet Mohammad. I have prevented him from entering Paradise because he rushed to bring death upon himself,” replied Allah. Qur’an 4:29.
The companions of the Prophet kept praising the heroism and effectiveness of one of the Muslims who was martyred during a military expedition, but the Prophet replied, “His lot is hell.” Because he was in so much pain and couldn’t walk, the man put the handle of his sword down and threw himself on top of it to commit himself.
The Islamic faith promotes patience and perseverance, which are greatly prized and highly rewarded. In Qur’an 39:10, it says, “Those who persist patiently will really earn a gift without measure.” Whatever adversity may befall you, “be patient and persevere” (Qur’an 31:17). “This, verily, is something to put one’s heart on.” Patients who think embracing and suffering pain in this life will benefit them in the afterlife might rely on this spiritual component for assistance when other methods of avoiding or reducing pain fail.