identity in the crucible

Identity in the Crucible

John Proctor’s Identity in the Crucible

Get Your Custom Essay Written From Scratch
Are You Overwhelmed With Writing Assignments?
Give yourself a break and turn to our top writers. They’ll follow all the requirements to compose a premium-quality piece for you.
Order Now

John Proctor is afraid of his Identity in the Crucible. It is apparent near the end when he resists Reverend Hale and Deputy Danforth’s posting of his name on the church doors, accusing him of witchcraft. John Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor’s husband, was involved in an affair while she was still working as a Proctor’s maid. Elizabeth fires Abigail after realizing the secret relationship between her maid and her husband. Abigail becomes very angry at Elizabeth’s dismissal, as women, even unmarried women, were not powerful enough to make decisions for themselves. Abigail decides to end Elizabeth’s life by playing Mafia-like wailing, doll-piercing games and forcing other Salem girls to join her.

Parris, the Salem minister during the Puritan era, was portrayed as a man who had a fiery demeanor and a brimstone-colored personification. He also doesn’t take into consideration any suggestions of others without his approval. Parris’ self-portrait reveals a man with a lot of enemies. Parris’s daughter Betty is now seriously ill after he finds her. People start making accusations about Betty having sex with the Devil.

Parris feels so anxious that he begins to make unfounded accusations against many people in the surrounding towns. Parris blames others for distracting attention from himself. Parris fears that his pastor position could be resigned if his niece and daughter are caught up in witchcraft, thus proving his Identity in the Crucible. Parris, who placed the title of a witch on the heads even of the most religious members of his community at the beginning of the play, makes him an insecure character. Parris is horrified by the loss of his job and others finding fault with him.

How Abigail Williams Show Identity in the Crucible.

Many characters in The Crucible can be written about, each with their own identity and personality. Abigail Williams has proven Identity in the Crucible. At first glance, she appears to be a beautiful orphan her uncle has adopted. However, once you get into more detail, you realize that she doesn’t care how other people are treated. I made a lemon tart with my ingredients to show Abigail Williams’s culinary skills. So I added dishonesty and greed to the mix.

We find out from the beginning that Abigail has “an endless capacity to dissemble”. We learn that Abigail can fake her feelings, so we shouldn’t completely trust her throughout this novel. The lemon tart looks delicious with its sweet pastry and fragrant lemon filling. However, it’s tart and tart. Abigail may look sweet on the outside, but she is sour inside and has few feelings towards others in the search for Identity in the Crucible.

Mistaken Identity in the Crucible

The power to determine one’s fate throughout history has been granted to those with the highest ethical and moral standards, thus Identity in the Crucible. There are often flaws in the system, and a miscarriage of justice occurs when innocent people are found guilty. Wrongful convictions can hurt the lives of loved ones and negatively affect society’s reputation.

Arthur Miller’s The Crucible reveals that Danforth is the most responsible for Salem’s tragedy. He allows his personal qualities to override his professional duties. Danforth’s convergent reasoning leads him to draw biased conclusions from his analysis of critical information. It can lead to innocent lives being lost. Danforth claims that the “voice from Heaven” is speaking through children and that he has no reason to believe that children might be tricking him.

Danforth believed in witchcraft occurring within Salem and that it was being spoken through children, thus confirming his Identity in the Crucible. He believes these children are the “voices of Heaven.” This belief is problematic because it causes Danforth to cast a biased judgment on the accused witches instead of seeking the truth. Ironically, he cannot see the truth because he is in a position to protect innocent people and seek the truth. But Danforth accuses innocents of being in league with the Devil. Danforth’s convergent thinking can be seen when he disputes Hale over whether John Proctor is righteous or not. He allows trials to continue under pretenses, and justice is not brought forward.

There is mistaken Identity in the Crucible when Danforth allows his personality to affect and conflict with his judgments, leading him to be the most responsible for Salem’s tragedy. He is prone to making poor judgments and analyzing crucial information with a narrow mind. He is also afraid of losing his reputation, so he continues to pursue incorrect accusations against others to prove his point. His misuse of power also causes Salem residents to fear him and become too afraid to present evidence. Because he lacks ethical beliefs, the power to determine one’s faith was granted to the wrong person. It leads to a miscarriage of justice.

The Quest for Identity in the Crucible

Proctor’s lover accuses Elizabeth Proctor, the protagonist, of witchcraft. John Proctor is forced to confess publicly to his affair and denounce his mistress to save his wife. In the horrible court scene, the girls who participated in the witch-hunt trials denounce their victims. Proctor makes futile attempts to break the girl’s grip on the trial court. It contributes to Identity in the Crucible.

Proctor is allowed to be freed by demonizing his witch friends. Proctor decides to endanger the honor of guiltless persons and instead chooses to kill them. Throughout the play, the crisis gradually escalates across all four acts. Act I seeks out the source of blame.

Both private and public problems. Act II depicts Proctor’s gradual invasion by the court.

Act III is the dominant action of Identity in the Crucible. It establishes the credibility of both the accuser and the accused. Act IV confirms the protagonist’s virtues by allowing him to choose to die for God. It is unambiguous that the individual’s decision in his life has a profound impact.

Proctor is the protagonist. Proctor’s crisis manifests in a shift in his mode of existence from private to public, thus Identity in the Crucible. Proctor was at the beginning of the play with a detachment attitude from both the Salem trials and prominent people like Reverend Parris or Thomas Putnam. Proctor is determined to keep his privacy and not get involved in matters that don’t concern him. While he walks away from the crowd of thunderheads, he says that he has a crop to sow and lumber to haul home. Proctor was presented as being trapped in a complicated situation that involved a serious predicament.

He considers his world and responsibility to it to end at the boundary. On the other hand, he finds that he is involved in a world outside his conscious intention, violating his boundary line. Proctor’s tragic ending is due to being forced between two opposing options, and he must choose one. Proctor’s heroism seems to have been thrust upon him. It puts him in a dangerous position where he must choose between two contradictory options.

Proctor’s journey to find his Identity in the Crucible is divided into two phases, one related to the witch hunt trials. He is initially involved in the socio-judicial process of these trials, but he does so voluntarily and unexpectedly. He was unaware that he was involved in a serious conspiracy.

John was forced to make a conscious decision. The second phase of Proctor’s involvement in public controversy was what triggered and required him to seek his Identity. Proctor does not see the tragic dimensions of the incident until he learns from Mary Warren in the beginning.

The events unfold very quickly after that. Protoctor informs his wife that his mind is to travel to Salem to voice his opposition to the proceedings. To his dismay, he finds out that many of the accused were his close friends. After the onset of social hysteria, this is Proctor’s first realization. Elizabeth, Proctor’s wife, was also arrested. Proctor is forced to give up his objective distance and accept the reality of these two events. Proctor is forced to redefine himself in light of the changed circumstances. It requires him to be involved in the trials to prove his Identity in the Crucible.

Elizabeth is well aware of her guilt as a wife and her role in encouraging Proctor to seek love and happiness elsewhere. In discovering his Identity in the Crucible, John Proctor’s journey to self-discovery is mirrored in Elizabeth’s desire for self-discovery after understanding that she was responsible for the death of Proctor. Self-awareness is important not just for Elizabeth but also for Proctor, whose last statement proclaiming his virtue becomes a triumphant note in his terrible end. Proctor’s death is a victory against the ridiculousness of the legal system, even though the law does not acknowledge his virtue.

Danforth’s personality is plagued by a crisis of self stemming from his deep belief in the rightness of the cause he stands for and his honesty in completing his task. According to Miller in Nelson, “Danforth’s picture of the world is a restricted vision.” Those who lived in Salem saw themselves as the bearers of sacred light. They thought that if this light was extinguished, the world would end. An ideology that seems so pure suggests an extreme perspective of the universe. Their race has made them a target of anti-Semitism, the total absence of color.

According to Miller, the norm in society is to look to religious leaders for moral direction to help find Identity in the Crucible; yet, in “The Crucible,” the clergy is shown to be wicked, attempting to compel its followers to violate their conscience in the name of “fighting the devil” and sacrificing their souls in the process.”

It’s also worth noting that Proctor’s quest for self-discovery is sparked by the ridiculousness of the judicial procedure, which makes him realize he can no longer be a detached spectator of the witch hunt trials. It is noteworthy. To rescue his wife, Proctor must accuse Abigail of murdering his wife on purpose, and he must do it while exposing his private life and feelings of guilt to the inquisition as a necessity. The intelligent girl, on the other hand, utilizes public excitement to capture Proctor. Because of this scenario, Proctor’s private life is in the public eye. In a way, Proctor bears two burdens of guilt. To begin with, he feels bad for cheating on his wife.

Hale provides a middle ground between Danforth and Proctor in his quest for Identity in the Crucible. In contrast to Danforth, Hale is ready to remove himself from the inhumane legal procedure. “I strongly object to these procedures,” he says. “I’m no longer a party in this case!”  Self-realization is evident in his public rebuke of the court, even though it was too late. “Hale lives in the understanding of his unworthiness.

Procter dies knowing his value: ” Hale cannot be compared to Proctor since he is not detached from them. “Quail not before God’s judgment in this because it may well be that God damns a liar less than he who throws his life away for pride,” Hale tells Elizabeth as he attempts to find his way back to himself; thus, Identity in the Crucible. Hale’s “self” has undergone a sea shift as a result of this. Even still, his quest for self-discovery doesn’t lead him to rise beyond the, nor is he able to speak out for a cause because of his guilt.